1. Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; (235):48-55.
2. Tanaka S, Tashiro T, Gomi A, et al. Cervical laminoplasty: The history and the future. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015; 55(7):555-62.
3. Hirabayashi K. The expansive open-door laminoplasty (ELAP): The original operative technique and its evolution. Neurospine. 2019; 16(1):8-13.
4. Hida K, Iwasaki Y, Koyanagi I, Abe H. Long-term follow-up study of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83(4):648-54.
5. Tsuji H. Laminoplasty for patients with compressive myelopathy due to developmental stenosis of the cervical canal. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society Editorial Committee, eds. The Cervical Spine. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1983: 490-502.
6. Fessler RG, Khoo LT. The history of cervical laminoplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(1):E1.
7. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H. The spinous process-splitting laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1981; 55:471-80.
8. Hirabayashi K, Bohlman H. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. In: The Cervical Spine Research Society Editorial Committee, eds. The Cervical Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1989: 610-6.
9. Lee SH, Kim ES, Eoh W. A comparative study of the effects of the French-door and the open-door laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46(6):531-6.
10. Sani S, Smith A, Jho HD. A simplified technique for cervical laminoplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(1):E5.
11. Weinberg DS, Rhee JM. Cervical laminoplasty: indication, technique, complications. J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(1):290-301.
12. Heller JG, Edwards CC 2nd, Murakami H, Rodts GE. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(12):1330-6.
13. Alizadeh Lasaki N, Nikkhoo M, Hasani K. Finite element analysis of laminoplasty in cervical spine biomechanics. Iranian Journal of Orthopedic Surgery. 2023; 21(2):62-8.
14. Boody B, Bhatt S, Mazur MD, et al. Biomechanics of Cervical Laminoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(2):E107-E116.
15. Puttlitz CM, Deviren V, Smith JA, Kleinstueck FS, Tran QNH, WR, et al. Biomechanics of cervical laminoplasty: kinetic studies comparing different surgical techniques, temporal effects, and the degree of level involvement. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(3):213-21.
16. Wang L, Li Y, Li J, et al. Anterior Decompression and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016; 92:517-25.
17. Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Ando K, et al. Complications of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a review of the literature. Spine J. 2014; 14(11):2751-63.
18. Lee DY, Park YJ, Kim H, et al. Axial Neck Pain after Cervical Laminoplasty: A Systematic Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(1):E1-E9.
19. Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(17):1969-73.
20. Vasavada AN, Li S, Voronov LI, et al. Influence of cervical spine sagittal alignment on spinal cord stress and strain in asymptomatic subjects: a finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2021;116:110221.
21. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR. Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98(3 Suppl):230-8.
22. Wang H, Lv B, Liu J, et al. Laminoplasty versus Laminectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020 137:e1-e10.
23. Fehlings MG, Smith JS, Kopjar B, et al. Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(5):425-432.
24. Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(18):1651-1658.
25. Manzano G, Witiw C, Badhiwala J, et al. A comparison of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(5):599-606.
26. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, et al. A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(26):E990-E993.
27. Shin JH, Shin DA, Yi S, et al. Surgical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty according to K-line and canal-occupying ratio in patients with OPLL. Neurospine. 2025;22(1):113-122.
28. Suda K, Moridaira H, Nakajima F, et al. Cervical kyphosis is a risk factor for poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(12):1253-1257.
29. Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93(2 Suppl):199-204.
30. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, et al. Preservation of the C2 spinous process and attached nuchal muscles is important for preventing postoperative axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(5):338-343.
31. Takeuchi K, Yokoyarna T, Aburakawa S, et al. Axial pain after cervical laminoplasty: a comparison of C3-6 laminoplasty with C3-7 laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18(5):392-396.
32. Shiraishi T. Skip laminectomy - a new treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, preserving the posterior nuchal ligament. Spine J. 2002; 2(2):108-15.
33. Kim K, Isu T, Sugawara A, et al. Myoarchitectonic spinolaminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4 Suppl):358-364.
34. Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Spine Surg. 2016; 2(2):93-101.
35. Liu X, Chen Y, Yang H, et al. Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024;8(5):e23.00282.
36. Luo J, Cao K, Huang S, et al. Comparison of laminoplasty with laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(6):1349-1360.
37. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. Laminectomy and stabilization with a cervical spine locking plate system for cervical myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(8):559-565.
38. Patel AA, Aleem IS, Guntin JA, et al. Cervical Laminoplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis. AANS Annual Scientific Meeting. 2023.
39. Koda M, Furuya T, Okawa A, et al. Bow hunter's syndrome after cervical laminoplasty in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 69:283-286.
40. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, van der Wilt GJ, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy: a new look at an old tool. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(4):347-353.
41. Bartels RHMA, Donk R, van der Wilt GJ, et al. The relation between the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and functional and quality-of-life outcomes for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2017;17(11):1625-1631.
42. Li Z, Tang J, Hou S, et al. The effect of sagittal parameters on axial neck pain after cervical posterior single-door laminoplasty. Front Surg. 2022;9:973924.
43. Park Y, Lee J, Lee SH, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of single open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56(2):126-132.
44. O'Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT, Crockard HA. A novel method for laminoplasty fixation. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1996; 84(4):703-705.
45. Wang JM, Lin CF, Chen Y, et al. The results of expansive open-door laminoplasty with plate fixation in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:31.
46. Chen Z, Liu Z, Yuan C, et al. Short-term predictive potential of quantitative assessment of spinal cord impairment in patients undergoing French-door Laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy: preliminary results of an exploratory study exploiting intraoperative ultrasound data. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):325.
47. Gu Y, Cao Z, Gao R, et al. Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 155:e336-e346.
48. Wang L, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):169-178.
49. Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, et al. Comparison of laminoplasty and laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2022;8:790593.
50. Lee SH, Kim KT, Suk KS, et al. C3 Laminectomy versus C3 Laminoplasty in French-door Laminoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2021;13(3):364-372.
51. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu H, et al. Efficacy and safety of laminoplasty combined with C3 laminectomy for patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2024;33(5):1848-1863.
52. Alafandi A, Koptan W, El-Miligui Y. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for management of multilevel cervical myelopathy. SICOT J. 2019; 5:2.
53. Highsmith JM, Dhall SS, Haid RW Jr, et al. Treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy: a cost and outcome comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and lateral mass fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):619-625.
54. Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 27(1):19-27.
55. Naderi S, Acar F, Mertol T. Functional results of cervical laminoplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003; 145(2):113-7.
56. Zileli M, Shiraishi T, Kato M. Laminoplasty for the treatment of primary spinal cord tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023; 39(1):9-18.
57. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, et al. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(11):1281-1284.
58. Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H. Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a comparative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(11):1188-93.
59. Ghogawala Z, Terrin N, Dunbar MR, et al. Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021; 325(10):942-51.
60. Anandan S, Price R, Chutkan N. Laminoplasty versus Laminectomy with Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in a North American Population. J Spine. 2019; 8:425.
61. Avetisian H, Mathew K, Myers A, et al. Laminoplasty vs Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy: Alarming Rates of Bias. Global Spine J. 2024:21925682241233857.
62. Lee DH, Cho JH, Kim NH, et al. The Incidence and Risk Factors of C5 Palsy after Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(5):586-592.
63. Epstein NE. C5 nerve root palsies following cervical spine surgery: A review. Surg Neurol Int. 2016; 7(Suppl 13):S349-S355.
64. Ito H, Neo M, Sakamoto T, et al. The trapezius muscle is a risk factor for neck pain after cervical laminoplasty. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2021;83(1):121-131.
65. Huang X, Liu D, Yang Y, Zhang Y. A novel surgical technique for cervical laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A case report and literature review. Front Surg. 2023; 10:1078138.
66. Abd-El-Barr MM, Lu Y, Ruan C, et al. Future Perspective of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11):3158.
67. Tian W, Wang H, Liu YJ. Robotic-assisted spine surgery: current development and future perspective. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020; 133(4):378-80.
68. Al-Kharazi KA, Al-Naser M, Pal D, et al. The role of robotics and navigation in spine surgery. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;79:104040.
69. Mobbs RJ, Rao P, Phan K. The future of robotics and artificial intelligence in spine surgery. J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(4):745-52.
70. Motov S, Stüer C, Barz M, et al. Navigation and robotics in spine surgery: a survey of AOSpine members. Global Spine J. 2023;13(4):993-1002.
71. Ghermandi R, Lovi A, Schiavi P, et al. The role of biomaterials and osteobiologics in modern spine surgery. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(3):141.
72. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in robot-assisted spinal surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 2011;34(3):325-332.
73. Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, Arnold PM. Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017; 27(4):361-70.
74. Shafi K, Gurusamy K, El-Kassab M, et al. The future of artificial intelligence in spine surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022;104(6):403-408.